[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1a4prRIYNw8GIkm@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:09:10 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/MCE, EDAC/mce_amd: Add support for new
MCA_SYND{1,2} registers
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 12:22:20PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> I ask because struct mce is UAPI. But I think this is just for /dev/mcelog,
> and this has been deprecated for a while. So on a related note, should
> /dev/mcelog be removed and struct mce moved out of UAPI? Then changes to
> struct mce won't affect user space, and we can just consider the mce trace
> event when reporting to user space.
Question is, do you want those error records to be fed into mcelog on
AMD too?
And I remember you guys supporting it at some point.
The answer to that question will tell you how exactly to build your
structure of data you shuffle to luserspace.
I'd say.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists