[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221024100801.6c391ff9@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:08:01 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: netdev@...io-technology.com
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@...il.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>,
Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@...il.com>,
Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@...il.com>,
Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 02/12] net: bridge: add blackhole fdb entry
flag
On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 07:32:02 +0200 netdev@...io-technology.com wrote:
> >> @@ -1140,7 +1148,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm,
> >> struct net_bridge *br,
> >> err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, true);
> >> } else {
> >> spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
> >> - err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, nfea_tb);
> >> + err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, ext_flags,
> >> nfea_tb);
> >
> > I believe the preference is to wrap to 80 columns when possible.
>
> Very strange... since I ran checkpatch.pl from the net-next kernel
> itself and it did not
> give me any warnings about 80 columns, but rather said 'patch is ready
> for submission'.
>
> As this is silent, could it be some missing python plugins or something
> to do with perl?
I run:
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --max-line-length=80
Powered by blists - more mailing lists