[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1bC4tzKOIHhrYE8@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:52:50 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] iommu/s390: Get rid of s390_domain_device
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 02:45:54PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> The struct s390_domain_device serves the sole purpose as list entry for
> the devices list of a struct s390_domain. As it contains no additional
> information besides a list_head and a pointer to the struct zpci_dev we
> can simplify things and just thread the device list through struct
> zpci_dev directly. This removes the need to allocate during domain
> attach and gets rid of one level of indirection during mapping
> operations.
>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v5->v6:
> - On attach failure make sure the IOAT is not registered
> and zdev->dma_table == NULL
> - Dropped Jason's R-b
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists