linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add TCSR node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2901a037-7b0c-1cf4-60fb-b3f6966454ad@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:31:55 -0400
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add TCSR node

On 24/10/2022 10:54, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>
>>> The binding has been picked up by Lee now so I posted the dts change.
>>> Could have added a lore link though.
>>
>> This also would work and help a lot.
>>
>> It depends in general on the maintainer - for example Greg does not want
>> to deal with individual patches, especially if DTS is just one patch and
>> USB would be 10 of them. Our toolset is not good for picking up 10 out
>> of 11. For all such cases - please provide link to lore.
>>
>> If however there are just two patches - one DTS and one for maintainer -
>> then having them in one patchset should not cause additional effort for
>> the maintainer.
> 
> I'm pretty sure I saw Lee complaining about Bjorn taking also the
> binding update through the qcom tree recently when someone did just
> that. Apparently it was TCSR related too:
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yzbk%2F6SQdpNQTahV@google.com/
> 
> Heh. That was you. :)

Yep. It was a patchset of 16 patches where one should go to MFD and 15
to Qualcomm SoC.

>  
>> As you can see on the list, majority of patchsets consist of
>> bindings+DTS. Pretty often entire piece - bindings+driver+DTS.
> 
> Yeah, and whatever alternative you go with, someone will get it wrong or
> complain it seems.

:)

Best regards,
Krzysztof