[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7345fb7f-f713-2fdf-5fce-8a0549ff3b7e@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:20:06 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>
CC: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com" <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
yangxingui <yangxingui@...wei.com>,
yanaijie <yanaijie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] libsas and drivers: NCQ error handling
On 24/10/2022 14:10, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> At least on the HoneyComb LX2,
> running with "arm-smmu.disable_bypass=0 iommu.passthrough=1" gives a working
> system (and working pm80xx).
>
> The ACPI IOMMU code that parses the ACPI IORT RMR revision E.d node
> was first included in kernel v6.0:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20220615101044.1972-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com/
>
> However, the HoneyComb edk2-platforms code has not yet been updated to add
> a ACPI IORT RMR revision E.d node.
>
> Considering that it works with "arm-smmu.disable_bypass=0 iommu.passthrough=1",
> I assume that the ACPI IORT RMR node basically just defines a number of
> memory regions which the IOMMU should treat as "bypass", while all other
> memory has to be re-mapped via the IOMMU as per usual.
Hi Niklas,
As I expected, unfortunately that did not help. Note that I actually
can't use passthrough on my platform due to SMMUv3 implementation bug,
so I just disable SMMUv3 entirely via kernel config.
I'm still betting on a memory ordering issue for me.
Thanks again,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists