[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221024174418.796468-4-longman@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:44:16 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.p.donnelly@...cle.com,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>,
Ting11 Wang 王婷
<wangting11@...omi.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] locking/rwsem: Change waiter->hanodff_set to a handoff_state enum
Change the boolean waiter->handoff_set to an enum type so that we can
have more states in some later patches. Also use READ_ONCE() outside
wait_lock critical sections for read and WRITE_ONCE() inside wait_lock
critical sections for write for proper synchronization. There is no
functional change.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index c68d76fc8c68..a8bfc905637a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -338,12 +338,17 @@ enum rwsem_waiter_type {
RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ
};
+enum rwsem_handoff_state {
+ HANDOFF_NONE = 0,
+ HANDOFF_REQUESTED,
+};
+
struct rwsem_waiter {
struct list_head list;
struct task_struct *task;
enum rwsem_waiter_type type;
+ enum rwsem_handoff_state handoff_state;
unsigned long timeout;
- bool handoff_set;
};
#define rwsem_first_waiter(sem) \
list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct rwsem_waiter, list)
@@ -470,7 +475,7 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_handoff);
}
- waiter->handoff_set = true;
+ WRITE_ONCE(waiter->handoff_state, HANDOFF_REQUESTED);
}
atomic_long_add(-adjustment, &sem->count);
@@ -622,7 +627,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
* waiter is the one that set it. Otherwisee, we
* still try to acquire the rwsem.
*/
- if (first->handoff_set && (waiter != first))
+ if (first->handoff_state && (waiter != first))
return false;
}
@@ -650,11 +655,11 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
/*
* We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or set
- * the handoff bit. Only the first waiter can have its handoff_set
+ * the handoff bit. Only the first waiter can have its handoff_state
* set here to enable optimistic spinning in slowpath loop.
*/
if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) {
- first->handoff_set = true;
+ WRITE_ONCE(first->handoff_state, HANDOFF_REQUESTED);
lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff);
return false;
}
@@ -1043,7 +1048,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
waiter.task = current;
waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
waiter.timeout = jiffies + RWSEM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
- waiter.handoff_set = false;
+ waiter.handoff_state = HANDOFF_NONE;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
@@ -1131,7 +1136,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
waiter.task = current;
waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE;
waiter.timeout = jiffies + RWSEM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
- waiter.handoff_set = false;
+ waiter.handoff_state = HANDOFF_NONE;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
rwsem_add_waiter(sem, &waiter);
@@ -1176,7 +1181,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
* In this case, we attempt to acquire the lock again
* without sleeping.
*/
- if (waiter.handoff_set) {
+ if (READ_ONCE(waiter.handoff_state)) {
enum owner_state owner_state;
preempt_disable();
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists