[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1bC6zkpmEx+XzRo@fedora>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:52:59 -0700
From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] mm/percpu: use list_first_entry_or_null in
pcpu_reclaim_populated()
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 04:14:29PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> To replace list_empty()/list_first_entry() pair to simplify code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/percpu.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
> index 26d8cd2ca323..a3fde4ac03a4 100644
> --- a/mm/percpu.c
> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
> @@ -2143,9 +2143,9 @@ static void pcpu_reclaim_populated(void)
> * other accessor is the free path which only returns area back to the
> * allocator not touching the populated bitmap.
> */
> - while (!list_empty(&pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot])) {
> - chunk = list_first_entry(&pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot],
> - struct pcpu_chunk, list);
> + while (chunk = list_first_entry_or_null(
> + &pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot],
> + struct pcpu_chunk, list)) {
> WARN_ON(chunk->immutable);
>
> /*
> --
> 2.34.1
>
With added parenthesis,
Acked-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists