[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221024113009.197311082@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:31:38 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 188/255] thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 68b99e94a4a2db6ba9b31fe0485e057b9354a640 ]
When CPU 0 is offline and intel_powerclamp is used to inject
idle, it generates kernel BUG:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: bash/15687
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
CPU: 4 PID: 15687 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7+ #57
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63
dump_stack+0x10/0x16
check_preemption_disabled+0xdd/0xe0
debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
powerclamp_set_cur_state+0x7f/0xf9 [intel_powerclamp]
...
...
Here CPU 0 is the control CPU by default and changed to the current CPU,
if CPU 0 offlined. This check has to be performed under cpus_read_lock(),
hence the above warning.
Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid this BUG.
Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
index 53216dcbe173..5e4f32733caf 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -535,8 +535,10 @@ static int start_power_clamp(void)
/* prefer BSP */
control_cpu = 0;
- if (!cpu_online(control_cpu))
- control_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ if (!cpu_online(control_cpu)) {
+ control_cpu = get_cpu();
+ put_cpu();
+ }
clamping = true;
schedule_delayed_work(&poll_pkg_cstate_work, 0);
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists