[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221024081435.204970-3-bhe@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:14:29 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] mm/percpu: use list_first_entry_or_null in pcpu_reclaim_populated()
To replace list_empty()/list_first_entry() pair to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
---
mm/percpu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 26d8cd2ca323..a3fde4ac03a4 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -2143,9 +2143,9 @@ static void pcpu_reclaim_populated(void)
* other accessor is the free path which only returns area back to the
* allocator not touching the populated bitmap.
*/
- while (!list_empty(&pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot])) {
- chunk = list_first_entry(&pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot],
- struct pcpu_chunk, list);
+ while (chunk = list_first_entry_or_null(
+ &pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot],
+ struct pcpu_chunk, list)) {
WARN_ON(chunk->immutable);
/*
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists