| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 23:04:24 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] cxl/acpi: Extract component registers of
restricted hosts from RCRB
On 20.10.22 22:17:07, Dan Williams wrote:
> Robert Richter wrote:
> > A downstream port must be connected to a component register block.
> > For restricted hosts the base address is determined from the RCRB. The
> > RCRB is provided by the host's CEDT CHBS entry. Rework CEDT parser to
> > get the RCRB and add code to extract the component register block from
> > it.
> >
> > RCRB's BAR[0..1] point to the component block containing CXL subsystem
> > component registers. MEMBAR extraction follows the PCI base spec here,
> > esp. 64 bit extraction and memory range alignment (6.0, 7.5.1.2.1).
> >
> > Note: Right now the component register block is used for HDM decoder
> > capability only which is optional for RCDs. If unsupported by the RCD,
> > the HDM init will fail. It is future work to bypass it in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> > index fb9f72813067..a92d5d7b7a92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> > #include "cxlpci.h"
> > #include "cxl.h"
> >
> > +#define CXL_RCRB_SIZE SZ_8K
> > +
> > static unsigned long cfmws_to_decoder_flags(int restrictions)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags = CXL_DECODER_F_ENABLE;
> > @@ -229,27 +231,82 @@ static int add_host_bridge_uport(struct device *match, void *arg)
> > struct cxl_chbs_context {
> > struct device *dev;
> > unsigned long long uid;
> > - resource_size_t chbcr;
> > + struct acpi_cedt_chbs chbs;
> > };
> >
> > -static int cxl_get_chbcr(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
> > - const unsigned long end)
> > +static int cxl_get_chbs(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
> > + const unsigned long end)
> > {
> > struct cxl_chbs_context *ctx = arg;
> > struct acpi_cedt_chbs *chbs;
> >
> > - if (ctx->chbcr)
> > + if (ctx->chbs.base)
> > return 0;
> >
> > chbs = (struct acpi_cedt_chbs *) header;
> >
> > if (ctx->uid != chbs->uid)
> > return 0;
> > - ctx->chbcr = chbs->base;
> > + ctx->chbs = *chbs;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static resource_size_t cxl_get_chbcr(struct cxl_chbs_context *ctx)
> > +{
>
> The core logic of this looks good, but this wants to be shared with the
> upstream port component register discovery.
>
> Full disclosure I am reconciling these patches with an attempt that Dave
> Jiang made at this topic. Since your series hit the list first I will
> let it take the lead, but then fill it in with comments and learnings
> from Dave's effort.
>
> So in this case Dave moved this into the drivers/cxl/core/regs.c with a
> function signature like:
>
> enum cxl_rcrb {
> CXL_RCRB_DOWNSTREAM,
> CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM,
> };
>
> resource_size_t cxl_rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev,
> resource_size_t rcrb_base, int len,
> enum cxl_rcrb which);
>
> ...where @which alternates when called by cxl_acpi for the downstream
> case, or cxl_mem for the upstream case.
Ok, I see where to go here. Could you point me to Dave's postings you
are referring to? I checked linux-cxl and could not find anything
related to RCRB or that changes regs.c.
>
>
> > + struct acpi_cedt_chbs *chbs = &ctx->chbs;
> > + resource_size_t component_reg_phys, rcrb;
> > + u32 bar0, bar1;
> > + void *addr;
> > +
> > + if (!chbs->base)
> > + return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> > +
> > + if (chbs->cxl_version != ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11)
> > + return chbs->base;
> > +
> > + /* Extract RCRB */
> > +
> > + if (chbs->length != CXL_RCRB_SIZE)
> > + return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> > +
> > + rcrb = chbs->base;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "RCRB found for UID %lld: 0x%08llx\n",
> > + ctx->uid, (u64)rcrb);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * RCRB's BAR[0..1] point to component block containing CXL
> > + * subsystem component registers. MEMBAR extraction follows
> > + * the PCI Base spec here, esp. 64 bit extraction and memory
> > + * ranges alignment (6.0, 7.5.1.2.1).
> > + */
> > + addr = ioremap(rcrb, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + SZ_8);
>
> No failure check? This also only needs to map 4K at a time.
Right, will add that.
>
> > + bar0 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
> > + bar1 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1);
> > + iounmap(addr);
> > +
> > + /* sanity check */
> > + if (bar0 & (PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_1M | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO))
> > + return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> > +
> > + component_reg_phys = bar0 & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
> > + if (bar0 & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> > + component_reg_phys |= ((u64)bar1) << 32;
> > +
> > + if (!component_reg_phys)
> > + return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Must be 8k aligned (size of combined CXL 1.1 Downstream and
> > + * Upstream Port RCRBs).
> > + */
> > + if (component_reg_phys & (CXL_RCRB_SIZE - 1))
> > + return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
>
> This is open-coding the IS_ALIGNED() macro. More importantly, why is it
> using RCRB size for the component register block alignment? The
> component lock is 64K, and at least for CXL 2.0 devices it is 64K
> aligned (8.1.9.1 Register Block Offset Low), so I am not sure what this
> check is for?
True, this is a mistake and needs to be corrected. It is the component
reg range which is 64k. Will also use IS_ALIGNED().
>
> ---
>
> Given that there are actual CXL RCH platforms in the wild I want this
> topic branch to be the first thing queued for v6.2. To help us
> coordinate I pushed:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cxl/cxl.git/log/?h=rch
>
> ...with the patches from this set accepted so far. You can use that as
> the baseline for the next spin.
Yes, thanks for that branch and applying the first part.
-Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists