[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1ZQSEMLkybFCadS@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:43:52 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] linux/container_of.h: Warn about loss of constness
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 11:26:10AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> container_of() casts the original type to another which leads to the loss
> of the const qualifier if it is not specified in the caller-provided type.
> This easily leads to container_of() returning a non-const pointer to a
> const struct which the C compiler does not warn about.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/container_of.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/container_of.h b/include/linux/container_of.h
> index 2f4944b791b81..c7c21d0f41a87 100644
> --- a/include/linux/container_of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/container_of.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
> * @type: the type of the container struct this is embedded in.
> * @member: the name of the member within the struct.
> *
> + * WARNING: as container_of() casts the given struct to another, also the
No need for "also" here (sorry for the grammar nit.)
> + * possible const qualifier of @ptr is lost unless it is also specified in
> + * @type. This is not a problem if the containing object is not const. Use with
> + * care.
I do not think these last two sentences you added here are needed
either.
> */
> #define container_of(ptr, type, member) ({ \
> void *__mptr = (void *)(ptr); \
> @@ -27,6 +31,11 @@
> * @type: the type of the container struct this is embedded in.
> * @member: the name of the member within the struct.
> *
> + * WARNING: as container_of() casts the given struct to another, also the
> + * possible const qualifier of @ptr is lost unless it is also specified in
> + * @type. This is not a problem if the containing object is not const. Use with
> + * care.
Same comments here.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists