[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871qqym1bt.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:56:22 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, david@...hat.com,
ziy@...dia.com, apopple@...dia.com, jingshan@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: migrate: Fix return value if all subpages of
THPs are migrated successfully
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:41 AM Andrew Morton
> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:16:23 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> > When THP migration, if THPs are split and all subpages are migrated successfully
>> > , the migrate_pages() will still return the number of THP that were not migrated.
>> > That will confuse the callers of migrate_pages(), for example, which will make
>> > the longterm pinning failed though all pages are migrated successfully.
>> >
>> > Thus we should return 0 to indicate all pages are migrated in this case.
>> >
>>
>> This had me puzzled for a while. I think this wording is clearer?
>>
>> : During THP migration, if THPs are not migrated but they are split and all
>> : subpages are migrated successfully, migrate_pages() will still return the
>> : number of THP pages that were not migrated. This will confuse the callers
>> : of migrate_pages(). For example, the longterm pinning will failed though
>> : all pages are migrated successfully.
>> :
>> : Thus we should return 0 to indicate that all pages are migrated in this
>> : case.
>>
>> This is a fairly longstanding problem? No Fixes: we can identify?
>
> It doesn't seem like a long standing issue. It seems like commit
> b5bade978e9b ("mm: migrate: fix the return value of migrate_pages()")
> fixed one problem, but introduced this new one IIUC.
>
> Before this commit, the code did:
>
> nr_failed += retry + thp_retry;
> rc = nr_failed;
>
> But retry and thp_retry were actually reset for each retry until the
> last one. So as long as there is no permanent migration failure and
> THP split failure, nr_failed should be 0 IIUC. TBH the code is a
> little bit hard to follow, please correct me if I'm wrong.
I think that you are correct. We can added
Fixes: b5bade978e9b ("mm: migrate: fix the return value of migrate_pages()")
>> Did you consider the desirability of a -stable backport?
I think this can be backport to -stable.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists