[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsciAuJD-UAcW3Ns43G5m1G466opq6_Y6RG1G4iVHwcHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:50:51 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernfs: dont take i_lock on inode attr read
On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 04:32, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
>
> The kernfs write lock is held when the kernfs node inode attributes
> are updated. Therefore, when either kernfs_iop_getattr() or
> kernfs_iop_permission() are called the kernfs node inode attributes
> won't change.
>
> Consequently concurrent kernfs_refresh_inode() calls always copy the
> same values from the kernfs node.
>
> So there's no need to take the inode i_lock to get consistent values
> for generic_fillattr() and generic_permission(), the kernfs read lock
> is sufficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists