[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbe5813e-337b-6c77-8571-cf400d4abc41@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:10:48 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
Cc: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] coresight-tpdm: Add reset node to TPDM node
On 08/09/2022 09:45, Tao Zhang wrote:
> TPDM device need a node to reset the configurations and status of
> it. This change provides a node to reset the configurations and
> disable the TPDM if it has been enabled.
It is not clear to me *why* this is needed. Please could you
elaborate on the use case of this ? See my questions below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
> index 69ea453..74cc653 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
> @@ -152,6 +152,37 @@ static void tpdm_init_default_data(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
> }
> }
>
> +static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf,
> + size_t size)
minor nit: Alignment
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + unsigned long val;
> + struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
> +
> + ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
So, any integer value written to the sysfs knob triggers the rest ?
It may be better to restrict this to "1".
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> + /* Reset all datasets to ZERO */
> + if (drvdata->dsb != NULL)
> + memset(drvdata->dsb, 0, sizeof(struct dsb_dataset));
> +
> + /* Init the default data */
> + tpdm_init_default_data(drvdata);
Why is this needed ? Does the DSB device configuration change
on the fly ?
> +
> + spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> +
> + /* Disable tpdm if enabled */
> + if (drvdata->enable)
> + coresight_disable(drvdata->csdev);
Why is this needed ? Isn't this supposed to be triggered from the "path"
when the trace session is complete ?
Suzuki
> +
> + return size;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(reset);
> +
> /*
> * value 1: 64 bits test data
> * value 2: 32 bits test data
> @@ -192,6 +223,7 @@ static ssize_t integration_test_store(struct device *dev,
> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(integration_test);
>
> static struct attribute *tpdm_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_reset.attr,
> &dev_attr_integration_test.attr,
> NULL,
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists