linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] vDPA: rename get_vq_num_max to get_vq_size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACGkMEsVP8qwT5aOqvwp-YjswT59Ctu6jDfYPBftzbn_wb7ZzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:17:22 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
Cc:     "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lingshan.zhu@...el.com" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vDPA: rename get_vq_num_max to get_vq_size_max

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:16 AM Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jason
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 10:01 AM
> > To: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > Cc: mst@...hat.com; virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; lingshan.zhu@...el.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vDPA: rename get_vq_num_max to get_vq_size_max
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 9:56 AM Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The get_vq_num_max of vdpa_config_ops is mean get the max size of vq,not
> > > the max number of vq,it is kind of confused,rename it.
> > > And get_vq_num_min rename to get_vq_size_min,
> > > set_vq_num rename to set_vq_size,
> > > rename implement of this ops also.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Not a native sparker. But num_max came from virtqueue structure:
> >
> > /*
> >  ...
> >  * @num_max: the maximum number of elements supported by the device.
> >  ...
> >  */
> >
> > struct virtqueue {
> >         ...
> >         unsigned int num_max;
> I noticed this also，and I always confused by the definition. Take virtio_pci_common_cfg for example:
>
> /* Fields in VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG: */
> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg {
>         ...
>     __le16 num_queues;      /* read-only */
>
> It just a suggestion.
> Thank you.

Let's hear from the others then decide.

Thanks

> >         ...
> > };
> >
> > Thanks
>