[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d30928d-d839-20bc-d101-91845ddfa871@ovn.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:14:56 +0200
From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: i.maximets@....org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFE net-next] net: tun: 1000x speed up
On 10/24/22 13:08, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Bump the advertised speed to at least match the veth. 10Gbps also
>> seems like a more or less fair assumption these days, even though
>> CPUs can do more. Alternative might be to explicitly report UNKNOWN
>> and let the application/user decide on a right value for them.
>>
>> Link: https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2022-July/051958.html
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>
>> ---
>>
>> Sorry for the clickbait subject line. Can change it to something more
>> sensible while posting non-RFE patch. Something like:
>>
>> 'net: tun: bump the link speed from 10Mbps to 10Gbps'
>>
>> This patch is RFE just to start a conversation.
>
> Yeah, well, it seems that internet already fallen for your clickbait
> :-(.
>
> https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-TUN-Driver-1000x
> Pavel
>
Oh, Wow... Sorry about that. :/
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists