[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221024112957.299670862@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:28:49 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 012/210] Revert "drm: bridge: analogix/dp: add panel prepare/unprepare in suspend/resume time"
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
[ Upstream commit cc62d98bd56d45de4531844ca23913a15136c05b ]
This reverts commit 211f276ed3d96e964d2d1106a198c7f4a4b3f4c0.
For quite some time, core DRM helpers already ensure that any relevant
connectors/CRTCs/etc. are disabled, as well as their associated
components (e.g., bridges) when suspending the system. Thus,
analogix_dp_bridge_{enable,disable}() already get called, which in turn
call drm_panel_{prepare,unprepare}(). This makes these drm_panel_*()
calls redundant.
Besides redundancy, there are a few problems with this handling:
(1) drm_panel_{prepare,unprepare}() are *not* reference-counted APIs and
are not in general designed to be handled by multiple callers --
although some panel drivers have a coarse 'prepared' flag that mitigates
some damage, at least. So at a minimum this is redundant and confusing,
but in some cases, this could be actively harmful.
(2) The error-handling is a bit non-standard. We ignored errors in
suspend(), but handled errors in resume(). And recently, people noticed
that the clk handling is unbalanced in error paths, and getting *that*
right is not actually trivial, given the current way errors are mostly
ignored.
(3) In the particular way analogix_dp_{suspend,resume}() get used (e.g.,
in rockchip_dp_*(), as a late/early callback), we don't necessarily have
a proper PM relationship between the DP/bridge device and the panel
device. So while the DP bridge gets resumed, the panel's parent device
(e.g., platform_device) may still be suspended, and so any prepare()
calls may fail.
So remove the superfluous, possibly-harmful suspend()/resume() handling
of panel state.
Fixes: 211f276ed3d9 ("drm: bridge: analogix/dp: add panel prepare/unprepare in suspend/resume time")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yv2CPBD3Picg%2FgVe@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220822180729.1.I8ac5abe3a4c1c6fd5c061686c6e883c22f69022c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
index 5855f17caf16..3a462240198a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
@@ -1473,12 +1473,6 @@ int analogix_dp_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct analogix_dp_device *dp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(dp->clock);
-
- if (dp->plat_data->panel) {
- if (drm_panel_unprepare(dp->plat_data->panel))
- DRM_ERROR("failed to turnoff the panel\n");
- }
-
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_suspend);
@@ -1494,13 +1488,6 @@ int analogix_dp_resume(struct device *dev)
return ret;
}
- if (dp->plat_data->panel) {
- if (drm_panel_prepare(dp->plat_data->panel)) {
- DRM_ERROR("failed to setup the panel\n");
- return -EBUSY;
- }
- }
-
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_resume);
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists