linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 06:36:08 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        avri.altman@....com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
        beanhuo@...ron.com, tomas.winkler@...el.com, cang@...eaurora.org,
        daejun7.park@...sung.com
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave_alloc()

On 10/25/22 04:44, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 16:25 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If having a look at
> 
> scsi_change_queue_depth() {
> 
>    depth = min_t(int, depth, scsi_device_max_queue_depth(sdev));
> 	...
> }
> 
> so the final depth per Lu is still 31.  I did test and debug, this is
> true.

Hi Bean,

Thanks for the clarification. I will add my Reviewed-by to this patch.

Bart.