[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1f5HU9crkPGX3SB@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:56:29 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Camel Guo <camel.guo@...s.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] net: dsa: Add driver for Maxlinear GSW1XX
switch
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(gsw1xx_shutdown);
>
> 1. EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
> 2. Why do you do it in the first place? It's one driver, no need for
> building two modules. Same applies to other places.
At some point, there is likely to be SPI and UART support. The
communication with the chip and the core driver will then be in
separate modules. But i agree this is not needed at the moment when it
is all linked into one.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists