linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/11] media: cedrus: Add helper for checking capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 17:17:47 +0200
From:   Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     mripard@...nel.org, paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, wens@...e.org,
        samuel@...lland.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] media: cedrus: Add helper for checking capabilities

Dne torek, 25. oktober 2022 ob 08:30:28 CEST je Dan Carpenter napisal(a):
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:15:08PM +0200, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > There is several different Cedrus cores with varying capabilities, so
> > some operations like listing formats depends on checks if feature is
> > supported or not.
> > 
> > Currently check for capabilities is only in format enumeration helper,
> > but it will be used also elsewhere later. Let's convert this check to
> > helper and while at it, also simplify it. There is no need to check if
> > capability mask is zero, condition will still work properly.
> 
> Sure.  That's true.  Out of curiousity, can cedrus_formats[i].capabilities
> be zero?  Because it feels like that's what should be checked.

Yes, it can be. It's the case for V4L2_PIX_FMT_NV12_32L32. All variants 
supports it, so there is no special capability needed in order to be listed. 
What would you check in such case? Condition still works for this case.

Best regards,
Jernej