[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221026003315.266d59d5c0780c2817be3a0d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:33:15 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: wuqiang <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mattwu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kretprobe events missing on 2-core KVM guest
On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 18:01:17 +0800
wuqiang <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com> wrote:
> Default value of maxactive is set as num_possible_cpus() for nonpreemptable
> systems. For a 2-core system, only 2 kretprobe instances would be allocated
> in default, then these 2 instances for execve kretprobe are very likely to
> be used up with a pipelined command.
>
> This patch increases the minimum of maxactive to 10.
>
This looks reasonable to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you!
> Signed-off-by: wuqiang <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 3220b0a2fb4a..b781dee3f552 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
> rp->maxactive = max_t(unsigned int, 10, 2*num_possible_cpus());
> #else
> - rp->maxactive = num_possible_cpus();
> + rp->maxactive = max_t(unsigned int, 10, num_possible_cpus());
> #endif
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBE_ON_RETHOOK
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists