[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7db9c3a5-2120-5ede-eb4e-077e3ed6c1f7@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 21:10:24 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
kernel@...ccoli.net, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Joshua Ashton <joshua@...ggi.es>,
Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Pierre-Loup Griffais <pgriffais@...vesoftware.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Zebediah Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>,
Andre Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] x86/split_lock: Add sysctl to control the misery mode
On 10/24/22 20:46, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> The prose can be improved:
I'm not sure that's a universal improvement. It chops out some valuable
context.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists