linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] zsmalloc/zram: configurable zspage size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1dmdycqFTztP8VE@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:30:47 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] zsmalloc/zram: configurable zspage size

On (22/10/25 01:12), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Sergey Senozhatsky (6):
>   zsmalloc: turn zspage order into runtime variable
>   zsmalloc/zram: pass zspage order to zs_create_pool()
>   zram: add pool_page_order device attribute
>   Documentation: document zram pool_page_order attribute
>   zsmalloc: break out of loop when found perfect zspage order
>   zsmalloc: make sure we select best zspage size

Andrew, I want to replace the last 2 patches in the series: I think
we can drop `usedpc` calculations and instead optimize only for `waste`
value. Would you prefer me to resend the entire instead?