lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:22:59 +0200
From:   Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
To:     Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, idryomov@...il.com,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ceph/super: add mount options "snapdir{mode,uid,gid}"

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 3:36 AM Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com> wrote:
> Currently cephx permission has already supported the 's' permission,
> which means you can do the snapshot create/remove. And for a privileged
> or specific mounts you can give them the 's' permission and then only
> they can do the snapshot create/remove. And all the others won't.

But that's a client permission, not a user permission.

I repeat: the problem is that snapshots should only be
accessible/discoverable/creatable by certain users (UIDs/GIDs) on the
client machine, independent of their permission on the parent
directory.

My patch decouples parent directory permissions from snapdir
permissions, and it's a simple and elegant solution to my problem.

> And then use the container or something else to make the specific users
> could access to them.

Sorry, I don't get it at all. What is "the container or something" and
how does it enable me to prevent specific users from accessing
snapdirs in their home directories?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ