[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91d563b6-5f1c-5ecc-0a40-7d8838770b22@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 01:18:26 +0200
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, shuah@...nel.org,
peterx@...hat.com, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, seanjc@...gle.com,
ricarkol@...gle.com, zhenyzha@...hat.com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: aarch64
cleanup/fixes
On 20.10.2022 09:12, Gavin Shan wrote:
> kvm/selftests/memslots_perf_test doesn't work with 64KB-page-size-host
> and 4KB-page-size-guest on aarch64. In the implementation, the host and
> guest page size have been hardcoded to 4KB. It's ovbiously not working
> on aarch64 which supports 4KB, 16KB, 64KB individually on host and guest.
>
> This series tries to fix it. After the series is applied, the test runs
> successfully with 64KB-page-size-host and 4KB-page-size-guest.
>
> # ./memslots_perf_tests -v -s 512
>
> Since we're here, the code is cleaned up a bit as PATCH[1-3] do. The
> other patches are fixes to handle the mismatched host/guest page
> sized.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com/T/#t
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20221018040454.405719-1-gshan@redhat.com/T/#t
>
> Changelog
> =========
> v3:
> * Improved comments about MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE, which is set
> to 64KB in PATCH[v3 4/6] and finally fixed to 192KB in
> PATCH[v3 5/6]. (Maciej)
> * Use size instead of pages to do the comparison in
> test_memslot_move_prepare() (Maciej)
> * Use tools/include/linux/sizes.h instead of inventing
> our own macros. (Oliver)
> v2:
> * Pick the smaller value between the ones specified by
> user or probed from KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS in PATCH[v2 3/6] (Maciej)
> * Improved comments about MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE in
> PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
> * Avoid mismatched guest page size after VM is started in
> prepare_vm() in PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
> * Fix condition to check MEM_TEST_{UNMAP, UNMAP_CHUNK}_SIZE
> in check_memory_size() in PATCH[v2 4/6] (Maciej)
> * Define base and huge page size in kvm_util_base.h in
> PATCH[v2 5/6] (Sean)
> * Add checks on host/guest page size in check_memory_size()
> and fail early if any of them exceeds 64KB in PATCH[v2 5/6] (Maciej)
>
>
> Gavin Shan (6):
> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare_vm()
> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate loop conditions in
> prepare_vm()
> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once
> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Support variable guest page size
> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory
> KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Report optimal memory slots
>
This patch set now looks good to me, so for the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
Thanks,
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists