linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/17] ARM: omap1: remove unused board files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1eZebwZTrPx+j5l@atomide.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:08:25 +0300
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-mmc @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] ARM: omap1: remove unused board files

* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> [221024 15:53]:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022, at 07:49, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi> [221021 11:02]:
> >> I was only referring to this Mistral add-on board and related display
> >> drivers.
> >> 
> >> The main OSK board support is still needed and used.
> 
> Ok, got it.
> 
> > I'm pretty sure I have that display, but I was booting my OSK in a
> > rack anyways so I rarely saw the LCD in use. No objections from me
> > for removing the LCD support for OSK if nobody is using it.
> 
> I was going to leave Mistral in, thinking it's just a device definition,
> but upon closer look I found that this is a somewhat annoyingly
> written part that hardcodes GPIO numbers in unusual ways, so I'm
> adding a patch to remove it now.

OK sounds good to me.

Thanks,

Tony