[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1ep5zN+wifkP7v+@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:18:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: fwnode: fix fwnode_irq_get_byname()
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:50:59AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> The fwnode_irq_get_byname() does return 0 upon device-tree IRQ mapping
> failure. This is contradicting the function documentation and can
> potentially be a source of errors like:
>
> int probe(...) {
> ...
>
> irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname();
> if (irq <= 0)
> return irq;
>
> ...
> }
>
> Here we do correctly check the return value from fwnode_irq_get_byname()
> but the driver probe will now return success. (There was already one
> such user in-tree).
>
> Change the fwnode_irq_get_byname() to work as documented and according to
> the common convention and abd always return a negative errno upon failure.
...
> + ret = fwnode_irq_get(fwnode, index);
> +
Redundant blank line and better to use traditional pattern:
> + if (!ret)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return ret;
if (ret)
return ret;
/* We treat mapping errors as invalid case */
return -EINVAL;
> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists