lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dcf284c6-dee5-d726-7f8f-c4ff1be99ddb@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:06:23 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     kernel@...labora.com, Derek Fang <derek.fang@...ltek.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: realtek,rt5682s: Add AVDD and
 MICVDD supplies

Il 25/10/22 00:00, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> The rt5682s codec can have two supplies: AVDD and MICVDD. They are
> already used by sc7180-trogdor-kingoftown.dtsi, so document them in the
> binding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> 

I also don't like these uppercase supply names... I wonder if it's worth changing
the driver to get "avdd" *or* "AVDD" (so, if "avdd" fails -> backwards compat)...

...this way, we can change the devicetree to use the lowercase names without
breaking abi.

Of course, this commit would need to be changed to document only the lowercase
supply names.

Driver-wise, we have a rt5682s_supply_names array... we could do something like:

static const char *rt5682s_supply_names_legacy[RT5682S_NUM_SUPPLIES] = {
	[RT5682S_SUPPLY_AVDD] = "AVDD",
	[RT5682S_SUPPLY_MICVDD] = "MICVDD",
};

static const char *rt5682s_supply_names[RT5682S_NUM_SUPPLIES] = {
	[RT5682S_SUPPLY_AVDD] = "avdd",
	[RT5682S_SUPPLY_MICVDD] = "micvdd",
};

for (...) assign_supply_names;
ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(...);

if (ret) {
	for (...) assign_legacy_supply_names;
	ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(...)
	if (ret)
		return ret;
}

What do you think?

Cheers,
Angelo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ