[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1e1tvMMXU5+8JQP@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:08:54 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Aleksey Romanov <AVRomanov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
"ngupta@...are.org" <ngupta@...are.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] zram: add size class equals check into recompression
On (22/10/25 09:49), Aleksey Romanov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:04:40AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (22/10/25 10:53), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > +unsigned int zs_get_class_size(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned int size)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct size_class *class = pool->size_class[get_size_class_index(size)];
> > > > +
> > > > + return class->size;
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_get_class_size);
I wonder if we want to return class->index instead of class->size?
Something like this (a sketch)
Return: the index of the zsmalloc &size_class that hold objects of the
provided size.
unsigned int zs_lookup_class_index(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned int size)
{
struct size_class *class = pool->size_class[get_size_class_index(size)];
return class->index;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists