linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/11] ARM: sa1100: make cpufreq driver build standalone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:14:19 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "Lubomir Rintel" <lkundrak@...sk>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] ARM: sa1100: make cpufreq driver build standalone

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 10:28, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 05:49:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> 
>> Commit 59a2e613d07f ("cpufreq: sa11x0: move cpufreq driver
>> to drivers/cpufreq") added an unnecessary reference to
>> mach/generic.h. Just remove it again after moving the code
>> into the corresponding driver.
>
> So how does arch/arm/mach-sa1100/clock.c get the MPLL rate with this
> change?

You are right, that's broken. It works for the defconfigs that
enable the cpufreq driver, but it seems I need to improve my
randconfig build testing to make sure I find problems like this
sooner.

I don't think anything depends on this patch, so I've dropped
it from my series now.

Thanks,

    Arnd