linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/drivers/mellanox: Use generic thermal_zone_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:32:17 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, vadimp@...dia.com
Cc:     vadimp@...dia.com, rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "open list:MELLANOX ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/drivers/mellanox: Use generic
 thermal_zone_get_trip() function

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 09:02:23AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Because I hope I can remove the ops->get_trip_ ops from thermal_ops
> structure before the end of this cycle.

OK. Vadim, any chance you can review the patch?

> May be you can consider moving the thermal driver into drivers/thermal?

I don't think it's worth the hassle (if possible at all). In practice,
this code is upstream for almost six years and IIRC we didn't have any
conflicts with the thermal tree. I don't expect conflicts this cycle
either.