[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221025114308.4kevtiz5heoekgz3@bogus>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:43:08 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuidle: dt: Return the correct numbers of parsed
idle states
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 05:10:12PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> While we correctly skips to initialize an idle state from a disabled idle
> state node in DT, the returned value from dt_init_idle_driver() don't get
> adjusted accordingly. Instead the number of found idle state nodes are
> returned, while the callers are expecting the number of successfully
> initialized idle states from DT.
>
> This leads to cpuidle drivers unnecessarily continues to initialize their
> idle state specific data. Moreover, in the case when all idle states have
> been disabled in DT, we would end up registering a cpuidle driver, rather
> than relying on the default arch specific idle call.
>
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists