[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1fYrM3o2ZudjZ/7@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:38:04 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Aleksey Romanov <AVRomanov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
"ngupta@...are.org" <ngupta@...are.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] zram: add size class equals check into recompression
On (22/10/25 11:55), Aleksey Romanov wrote:
> > Return: the index of the zsmalloc &size_class that hold objects of the
> > provided size.
> >
> > unsigned int zs_lookup_class_index(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned int size)
> > {
> > struct size_class *class = pool->size_class[get_size_class_index(size)];
> >
> > return class->index;
> > }
>
> Sure. I think it would be more logical, and perhaps such a function
> would be more applicable in other cases, in the future.
>
> Will you fix it in your cherry-pick?
For that I probably will ask you to send out v2, if possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists