[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db3183ee-df61-a9fd-abdf-92df6d578ec6@igalia.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:57:42 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
kernel@...ccoli.net, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Joshua Ashton <joshua@...ggi.es>,
Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Pierre-Loup Griffais <pgriffais@...vesoftware.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Zebediah Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>,
Andre Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] x86/split_lock: Add sysctl to control the misery mode
Other than that, is this version good enough in your opinion Dave?
Personally I think Bagas could submit a patch later and propose the
changes to the docs as well.
Cheers,
Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists