[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221026053046.GB5179@thinkpad>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:00:46 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
Cc: jingoohan1@...il.com, gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, linmq006@...il.com,
ffclaire1224@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kthota@...dia.com, mmaddireddy@...dia.com, sagar.tv@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] PCI: qcom-ep: Refactor EP initialization
completion
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:27:11PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Move the post initialization code to .ep_init_late() call back and call
> only dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() which internally takes care of calling
> dw_pcie_ep_init_complete().
>
> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
> ---
> V5:
> * None
>
> V4:
> * New patch in this series
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 27 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> index e33eb3871309..c418b20042aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> @@ -361,22 +361,12 @@ static int qcom_pcie_perst_deassert(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> PARF_INT_ALL_LINK_UP;
> writel_relaxed(val, pcie_ep->parf + PARF_INT_ALL_MASK);
>
> - ret = dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(&pcie_ep->pci.ep);
> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(&pcie_ep->pci.ep);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to complete initialization: %d\n", ret);
> goto err_disable_resources;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * The physical address of the MMIO region which is exposed as the BAR
> - * should be written to MHI BASE registers.
> - */
> - writel_relaxed(pcie_ep->mmio_res->start,
> - pcie_ep->parf + PARF_MHI_BASE_ADDR_LOWER);
> - writel_relaxed(0, pcie_ep->parf + PARF_MHI_BASE_ADDR_UPPER);
Writes to the MHI base addresses are required before starting LTSSM and not
necessarily before core_init notifier. So you could just leave this code here
and get rid of .ep_init_late() callback.
And you should also rebase the series on top of v6.1-rcX as I've added few more
code in this function.
Thanks,
Mani
> -
> - dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(&pcie_ep->pci.ep);
> -
> /* Enable LTSSM */
> val = readl_relaxed(pcie_ep->parf + PARF_LTSSM);
> val |= BIT(8);
> @@ -643,8 +633,23 @@ static void qcom_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> }
>
> +static void qcom_pcie_ep_init_late(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + struct qcom_pcie_ep *pcie_ep = to_pcie_ep(pci);
> +
> + /*
> + * The physical address of the MMIO region which is exposed as the BAR
> + * should be written to MHI BASE registers.
> + */
> + writel_relaxed(pcie_ep->mmio_res->start,
> + pcie_ep->parf + PARF_MHI_BASE_ADDR_LOWER);
> + writel_relaxed(0, pcie_ep->parf + PARF_MHI_BASE_ADDR_UPPER);
> +}
> +
> static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pci_ep_ops = {
> .ep_init = qcom_pcie_ep_init,
> + .ep_init_late = qcom_pcie_ep_init_late,
> .raise_irq = qcom_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
> .get_features = qcom_pcie_epc_get_features,
> };
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists