[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1jVjX9FUuUilcjA@li-05afa54c-330e-11b2-a85c-e3f3aa0db1e9.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 12:07:01 +0530
From: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, vschneid@...hat.com,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sshegde@...ux.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, ritesh.list@...il.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: sched/debug: CPU hotplug operation suffers in a large cpu systems
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 01:04:40PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Why do you need to? What tools require these debugfs files to be
> present?
We are not entirely sure what applications (if any) might be using this interface.
> And if you only have 7-8 files per CPU, that does not seem like a lot of
> files overall (14000-16000)? If you only offline 1 cpu, how is removing
> 7 or 8 files a bottleneck? Do you really offline 1999 cpus for a 2k
> system?
It's 7-8 files per domain per cpu, so, in a system with approx 2k cpus and five
domains, the total file count goes above 70k-80k files. And, when we offline 1
CPU, the entire directory is rebuilt, resulting in creation of all the files
again.
Thanks
-- vishal.c
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists