[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1knRM2jU8RhlFWn@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:25:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: wangkailong@...i.cn, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, motolav@...il.com, cezary.rojewski@...el.com,
mkumard@...dia.com, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com, peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA/ASoC: replace ternary operator with min()
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 07:28:26AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:56:11PM +0800, wangkailong@...i.cn wrote:
> > > sound/soc/soc-ops.c:817: WARNING opportunity for min()
> > > kfree(uctl);
> > > - return err < 0 ? err : 0;
> > > + return min(err, 0);
> > I don't think this is a good warning, while I'm no big fan of the
> > ternery operator the new code is less clear about the intent than the
> > old code.
> Agreed. That use of ternery is a standard idiom.
> If we have to eliminate the use of ternery inevitably, it'd be better
> to introduce a new macro for clarity instead.
It looks like it's more about identifying a pattern that could be min()
but not being able to detect the semantics of why we're comparing
numbers.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists