[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <25246B91-B5BE-43CA-9D98-67950F17F0A1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:36:22 +0200
From: Michael Lilja <michael.lilja@...il.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Periodically flow expire from flow offload tables
Hi,
I will look to use the flowable netlink interface. I have not yet, but does this possible give the option of doing something like this:
flowtable ft {
hook ingress priority filter
devices = { lan1, lan2, wan }
flags offload, timeout
}
I would say the above it the most flexible, I just didn’t explore that, it would kinda be like with ’sets’ where you can specify a timeout on when the entries should expire?
With regards to the IPS_OPPLOAD clear in flow_offload_del() then I added that because I saw some weird timeout side effects due to flow_offload_fixup_ct(), but I can re-investigate, it could be that it was early in my investigations and some of the other changes I made has made it obsolete.
Thanks
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists