[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAH4kHZuvdKYCwkuG7bOwQsAvctgqXhxZLpCWORnngwHavWsDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:11:28 -0700
From: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>
To: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/sev: Change snp_guest_issue_request's fw_err
>
> In another thread Borislav suggested we edit snp_issue_guest_request()
> to take a parameter struct pointer instead of a long list of args.
> Should we use the opportunity to do this instead of making this list
> longer?
I'm just renaming and changing the type of an argument. If you'd like
a struct argument cleanup patch first, I can do that.
--
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists