[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221027182240.E9FA0C433D6@smtp.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:22:37 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: Introduce pdc bindings for QDU1000 and QRU1000
Quoting Melody Olvera (2022-10-26 12:04:41)
> Add compatible fields for QDU1000 and QRU1000 pdcs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
> ---
Is there a reason why this patch continues to be included in what is
otherwise a clk driver patch series? Can this patch be sent separately
from the clk patches (and not Cced to clk maintainers/list) in the
future?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists