linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 00/31] timers: Use del_timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221027191136.GA3226977@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:11:36 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 00/31] timers: Use del_timer_shutdown() before
 freeing timers

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:02:37PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:58:59 -0700
> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> 
> > This is with arm64_defconfig plus various debug options.
> > Running the same test with v6.0.4 produces no errors, and neither
> > does running it with v6.1-rc2-105-gb229b6ca5abb (current mainline).
> 
> So it works on current stable and current mainline? Does that mean we need
> to worry about this?
> 
Sorry, I wasn't clear. The test on v6.0.4 and v6.1-rc2-105-gb229b6ca5abb was
without your patch set but with all ODEBUG options enabled, to be sure
that there is no pre-existing condition.

Guenter