[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eeb3e06d-316a-1ff8-b4b8-c257fa03a206@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:31:08 -0700
From: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: Introduce pdc bindings for
QDU1000 and QRU1000
On 10/27/2022 11:22 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Melody Olvera (2022-10-26 12:04:41)
>> Add compatible fields for QDU1000 and QRU1000 pdcs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
>> ---
> Is there a reason why this patch continues to be included in what is
> otherwise a clk driver patch series? Can this patch be sent separately
> from the clk patches (and not Cced to clk maintainers/list) in the
> future?
Sure thing. On reflection, this belongs with the misc support patches.
Thanks,
Melody
Powered by blists - more mailing lists