[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221027222824.GA4101506@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 15:28:24 -0700
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"bagasdotme@...il.com" <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Shahar, Sagi" <sagis@...gle.com>,
"imammedo@...hat.com" <imammedo@...hat.com>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
isaku.yamahata@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/21] x86/tdx: Use enum to define page level of TDX
supported page sizes
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 08:42:16AM +0000,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 15:08 +0800, Li, Xiaoyao wrote:
> > > @@ -663,27 +662,16 @@ static bool try_accept_one(phys_addr_t *start,
> > > unsigned long len,
> > > if (len < accept_size)
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > + /* TDX only supports 4K/2M/1G page sizes */
> >
> > yes, a page can be mapped as 1G size to TD via secure/shared EPT. But
> > for this particular TDX_ACCEPT_PAGE case, it only supports 4K and 2M
> > currently, which is defined in TDX module spec.
>
> I checked the TDX module public spec, and it appears you are right. But I am
> not sure whether it will be changed in the future?
>
> Anyway this patch doesn't intend to bring any functional change (I should have
> stated this in the changelog), so I think fixing to this, if ever needed, should
> be another patch.
>
> Hi Isaku,
>
> You suggested to introduce a helper, but this reminds me how KVM is going to use
> this helper? KVM secure EPT can accept more levels than try_accept_one().
>
> Perhaps I can just get rid of this helper? TDX host series only needs some
> definitions to represent 4K/2M/1G page to get rid of using magic numbers.
Ok, let remove the helper function. The usage seems different from KVM case.
In KVM side, it can introduce its own helper.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists