linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/lima: Fix opp clkname setting in case of missing regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221027080519.lfpduyt7jcwh3b4k@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:35:19 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>
Cc:     Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, lima@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/lima: Fix opp clkname setting in case of missing
 regulator

On 27-10-22, 09:32, Erico Nunes wrote:
> Commit d8c32d3971e4 ("drm/lima: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()")
> introduced a regression as it may undo the clk_names setting in case
> the optional regulator is missing. This resulted in test and performance
> regressions with lima.
> 
> Restore the old behavior where clk_names is set separately so it is not
> undone in case of a missing optional regulator.
> 
> Fixes: d8c32d3971e4 ("drm/lima: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()")
> Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: revert back to using devm_pm_opp_set_clkname and
> devm_pm_opp_set_regulators
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> index 011be7ff51e1..bc8fb4e38d0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> @@ -112,11 +112,6 @@ int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev)
>  	unsigned long cur_freq;
>  	int ret;
>  	const char *regulator_names[] = { "mali", NULL };
> -	const char *clk_names[] = { "core", NULL };
> -	struct dev_pm_opp_config config = {
> -		.regulator_names = regulator_names,
> -		.clk_names = clk_names,
> -	};
>  
>  	if (!device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2"))
>  		/* Optional, continue without devfreq */
> @@ -124,7 +119,15 @@ int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev)
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&ldevfreq->lock);
>  
> -	ret = devm_pm_opp_set_config(dev, &config);
> +	/*
> +	 * clkname is set separately so it is not affected by the optional
> +	 * regulator setting which may return error.
> +	 */
> +	ret = devm_pm_opp_set_clkname(dev, "core");
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, regulator_names);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		/* Continue if the optional regulator is missing */
>  		if (ret != -ENODEV)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh