[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8tK8qQHNnwgvUiMMHOuBfVmbLyMvT4RZjq055nrda8yPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:20:24 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
soc@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g043: Split out
RZ/G2UL SoC specific parts
Hi Geert,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 5:13 PM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Geert,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:37 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Prabhakar,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:12 AM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > >
> > > Move RZ/G2UL SoC specific parts to r9a07g043u.dtsi so that r9a07g043.dtsi
> > > can be shared with RZ/Five (RISC-V SoC).
> > >
> > > Below are the changes due to which SoC specific parts are moved to
> > > r9a07g043u.dtsi:
> > > - RZ/G2UL has Cortex-A55 (ARM64) whereas the RZ/Five has AX45MP (RISC-V)
> > > - RZ/G2UL has GICv3 as interrupt controller whereas the RZ/Five has PLIC
> > > - RZ/G2UL has interrupts for SYSC block whereas interrupts are missing
> > > for SYSC block on RZ/Five
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > This assumes the operating points tables are the same for both variants?
> > I guess that's OK.
> >
> Ive asked the HW team to confirm this. For the v2 I'll keep it as is
> and later move it if required.
>
Ive confirmed with the HW team the OPP table is the same for both the variants.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists