[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166686601585.8143.16275733107810431975.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:20:15 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Junxiao Chang <junxiao.chang@...el.com>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
veekhee@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] net: stmmac: remove duplicate dma queue channel
macros
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:17:47 +0800 you wrote:
> It doesn't need extra macros for queue 0 & 4. Same macro could
> be used for all 8 queues. Related queue/channel functions could
> be combined together.
>
> Original macro which has two same parameters is unsafe macro and
> might have potential side effects. Each MTL RxQ DMA channel mask
> is 4 bits, so using (0xf << chan) instead of GENMASK(x + 3, x) to
> avoid unsafe macro.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v2] net: stmmac: remove duplicate dma queue channel macros
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/330543d04f2c
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists