[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1qVWOyJuALz0vXf@alley>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:27:36 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v2 38/38] printk, xen: fbfront: create/use safe
function for forcing preferred
On Thu 2022-10-27 15:41:23, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2022-10-27, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> >> - if (c) {
> >> - unregister_console(c);
> >> - c->flags |= CON_CONSDEV;
> >> - c->flags &= ~CON_PRINTBUFFER; /* don't print again */
> >> - register_console(c);
> >> - }
> >> + if (c)
> >> + console_force_preferred(c);
> >
> > I would prefer to fix this a clean way.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I would suggest to implement:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > It is a more code. But it is race-free. Also it is much more clear
> > what is going on.
> >
> > How does this sound, please?
>
> I wasn't sure if any of the other preferred-console magic in
> register_console() was needed, which is why I kept a full
> register_console() call. But if it really is just about forcing it the
> head and setting a new CON_CONSDEV, then your suggestion is much
> simpler. Thanks.
I believe that it is just this. I have spent a lot of time
investigating these hacks when thinking about refactoring
of register_console().
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists