[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03677288-2e96-a66e-fb1a-331e3b0d112f@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 08:27:06 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
len.brown@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com, chao.gao@...el.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, bagasdotme@...il.com,
sagis@...gle.com, imammedo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/21] x86/tdx: Use enum to define page level of TDX
supported page sizes
On 10/26/22 16:16, Kai Huang wrote:
> +/*
> + * Get the TDX page level based on the kernel page level. The caller
> + * to make sure only pass 4K/2M/1G kernel page level.
> + */
> +static inline enum tdx_pg_level to_tdx_pg_level(enum pg_level pglvl)
> +{
> + switch (pglvl) {
> + case PG_LEVEL_4K:
> + return TDX_PG_LEVEL_4K;
> + case PG_LEVEL_2M:
> + return TDX_PG_LEVEL_2M;
> + case PG_LEVEL_1G:
> + return TDX_PG_LEVEL_1G;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + }
> + return TDX_PG_LEVEL_NUM;
> +}
Is TDX_PG_LEVEL_NUM part of the ABI? Or, is this going to accidentally
pass a whacky value to the SEAM module?
This needs something like this at the call-site:
page_size = to_tdx_pg_level(pg_level);
if (page_size >= TDX_PG_LEVEL_NUM)
return false;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists