[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221028170647.GA898435@bhelgaas>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 12:06:47 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Om Prakash Singh <omp@...dia.com>,
Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: pci-epf-test: Register notifier if only
core_init_notifier is enabled
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 06:01:01PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> Need to register pci_epf_test_notifier function event if only
> core_init_notifier is enabled.
>
> Fixes: 5e50ee27d4a5 ("PCI: pci-epf-test: Add support to defer core initialization")
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> Acked-by: Om Prakash Singh <omp@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> This patch is a part of series "PCI: endpoint: Fix core_init_notifier feature".
> The rest of the patches have been withdrawn.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Add Acked-by lines
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Add Acked-by lines
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 36b1801a061b..55283d2379a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_bind(struct pci_epf *epf)
> if (ret)
> epf_test->dma_supported = false;
>
> - if (linkup_notifier) {
> + if (linkup_notifier || core_init_notifier) {
> epf->nb.notifier_call = pci_epf_test_notifier;
> pci_epc_register_notifier(epc, &epf->nb);
Why does pci_epc_register_notifier() even exist? It's not used at all
except for this test code.
It would be better if infrastructure like this were connected with
some user of it.
> } else {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists