[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bza_6qND8iOuiur+xX0cBVkKJfKoJAOjihnVYRjoB3tWqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:09:16 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Rong Tao <rtoax@...mail.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, haoluo@...gle.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, rongtao@...tc.cn, sdf@...gle.com,
song@...nel.org, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] samples/bpf: Fix sockex3: missing BPF prog type
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 6:01 PM Rong Tao <rtoax@...mail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply, actually, i tried another method, which can solved
> this error, recognize "socket/xxx" as "socket". However, it maybe influence
> other BPF prog or not? What do you think the following patch?
Don't fix libbpf, it's not broken. Fix the sample.
>
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -8659,7 +8659,7 @@ static bool sec_def_matches(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec_def, const char *sec_n
> return false;
> }
>
> - return strcmp(sec_name, sec_def->sec) == 0;
> + return strncmp(sec_name, sec_def->sec, len) == 0;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists